Pengaruh Pemberian Soal Matematika Jenis Open-Ended Problems Terhadap Kemampuan Siswa Memecahkan Masalah Program Linier

Ita Chairun Nissa, Puji Lestari, Dian Kumala

Abstract


[Title: The Effect of Open-Ended Problems on Mathematics Problem toward Students' Ability in Solving Linear Program Problems]. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the provision of linear program mathematical problems in the form of open-ended problems can affect students' problem-solving abilities. This research is an experiment with one sample group, 28 students of class XI IPA-2 in SMA Negeri 7 Mataram. Data was collected through tests and interviews that were statistically analyzed both descriptive and inferential. The validity of mathematical problems is based on expert judgment while the reliability is tested using product-moment correlation. Pre-test and post-test data have been tested both homogeneous and normally distributed. The homogeneity test uses the F-test statistics and the normality test uses the interpretation of skewness and kurtosis. The influence test is performed using one-party t-test statistics. Student problem-solving performance was assessed using a holistic rubric. All data is processed using data analysis tools on Microsoft Excel. This experiment showed success by obtaining an average test score of students when the pre-test was 39.58 which then increased when the post-test became 79.76. This increase was statistically significant as evidenced by the one-party t-test where tcount = 37.33> ttable = 1.67 at α = 0.05, which means that Ha was accepted. So it can be concluded that there is an effect of the treatment given a mathematical problem in the form of open-ended problems to the ability of students to solve linear program problems.

Keywords


Mathematical Problem Solving; Open-Ended Problems; Linear Program

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al-Absi, M. (2013). The Effect of Open-Ended Tasks As an Assessment Tool on Fourth Graders’ Mathematics Achievement, and Assessing Students’ Perspectives about it. Jordan Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(3), 345-351. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1c67/6490135ba81cd1be9a8c8e7782cfe5df0ed3.pdf

Ariawan, B., Muhsetyo, G., & Qohar, A. (2016). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Multimedia Pembelajaran Berbasis Edutainment Materi Program Linier di SMK-PP N Kupang. Pada Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (pp.261-268). Yogyakarta, Indonesia: FMIPA, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Asih, I. M. (2011). Peningkatan Kemampuan Siswa SMAN 8 Denpasar dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pokok Bahasan Program Linier Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Buletin Udayana Mengabdi, 10(2), 67-71. Retrieved from: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/jum/article/view/2105

Bahar, A., & Maker, C. (2015). Cognitive Backgrounds of Problem Solving: A Comparison of Open-ended vs. Closed Mathematics Problems. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1531-1546. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1410a

Bazaraa, M. S., Jarvis, J. J., & Sherali, H. D. (2011). Linear Programming and Network Flows (p. 2011). USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Bingolbali, E. (2011). Multiple Solutions to Problems in Mathematics Teaching: Do Teachers Really Value Them?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 18-31. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n1.2

Bobis, J., Way, J., Anderson, J., & Martin, A. J. (2016). Challenging Teacher Beliefs About Student Engagement in Mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19(1), 33-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9300-4

Diefes-Dux, H. A., Zawojewski, J. S., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2010). Using educational research in the design of evaluation tools for open-ended problems. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 807-819. Retrieved from: http://www.modelsandmodeling.pitt.edu/Publications_files/Heidi_Ijee2330.pdf

Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., & Sabandar, J. (2016). Open-Ended Approach: An Effort in Cultivating Students' Mathematical Creative Thinking Ability and Self-Esteem in Mathematics. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 11-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2813.9-18

Fuchs, L. S., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2010). The Effects of Strategic Counting Instruction, with and without Deliberate Practice, on Number Combination Skill Among Students With Mathematics difficulties. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.003

Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th Edition (p.29). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Guberman, R., & Leikin, R. (2013). Interesting and Difficult Mathematical Problems: Changing Teachers’ Views by Employing Multiple-Solution Tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 33-56. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9210-7

Intaros, P., Inprasitha, M., & Srisawadi, N. (2014). Students’ Problem Solving Strategies in Problem Solving-Mathematics Classroom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(1), 4119-4123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.901

Jones, I., Swan, M., & Pollitt, A. (2015). Assessing mathematical problem solving using comparative judgement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 151-177. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9497-6

Lehtinen, E., Hannula-Sormunen, M., McMullen, J., & Gruber, H. (2017). Cultivating Mathematical Skills: From Drill-and-Practice to Deliberate Practice. ZDM: Mathematics Education Research Journal, 49(4), 625-636. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0856-6

Niedomysl, T., & Malmberg, B. (2009). Do Open‐Ended Survey Questions on Migration Motives Create Coder Variability Problems?. Population, Space and Place, 15(1), 79-87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.493

Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Educational Psychology: Developing Learners (p. 744). Ohio: Carlisle Communication, Ltd.

Ratnasari, R., & Zanthy, L. S. (2019). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Teori Program Linier dengan Menggunakan Metode Problem Solving di SMK Nurul Hidayah Pasundan Cianjur. Journal on Education, 1(3), 322-326. Retrieved from: http://jonedu.org/index.php/joe/article/view/165

Rittle-Johnson, B., Matthews, P. G., Taylor, R. S., & McEldoon, K. L. (2011). Assessing Knowledge of Mathematical Equivalence: A Construct-Modeling Approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 85-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021334

Rofiah, E., Aminah, N. S., & Ekawati, E. Y. (2013). Penyusunan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Fisika Pada Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 17-22. Retrieved from: http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/pfisika/article/view/2797

Rolia, R., Rosmaiyadi, R., & Husna, N. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa pada Materi Program Linier Kelas XI SMK. VOX EDUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(2), 72-82. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31932/ve.v8i2.39

Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2013). Assessing Students' Mathematical Problem-Solving and Problem-Posing Skills. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 54-60. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n16p54

Sariningsih, R., & Purwasih, R. (2017). Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dan Self Efficacy Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 163-177.

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v1i1.275

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sumarni, T., & Umar, F. I. T. (2018). Tinjauan Pemahaman Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Pada Materi Program Linier Siswa SMK Negeri 1 Painan dengan Penerapan Strategi REACT. Menara Ilmu, 12(11), 151-158. Retrieved from: https://jurnal.umsb.ac.id/index.php/menarailmu/article/view/1064

Suwanti, R. (2016). Proses Scaffolding Berdasarkan Diagnosis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Program Linear. Pada Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya I (pp.440-448). Solo, Indonesia: Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Vorderman, C., Porkess, R., Budd, C., Dunne, R., & Rahman-Hart, P. (2011). A World-Class Mathematics Education for All Our Young People (p.108). London: The Conservative Party.

Walport, M., Goodfellow, J., McLoughlin, F., Post, M., Sjøvoll, J., Taylor, M., & Waboso, D. (2010). Science and Mathematics Secondary Education for The 21st Century: Report of The Science and Learning Expert Group (p. 188). London: Department for Business, Industry and Skills.

Wulanzani, U. T., Lestari, U., & Syamsyuri, I. (2016). Hasil Validasi Buku Teks Matakuliah Bioteknologi Berbasis Bahan Alam Tanaman Pacing (Costus Speciosus Smith) sebagai Antifertilitas. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 1(9), 1830-1835. Retrieved from: http://journal.um.ac.id/index.php/jptpp/article/view/6837/3018

Yuliana, R. (2016). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Kelas X SMA Negeri 22 Makassar. Doctoral Dissertation. Universitas Negeri Makassar.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v7i2.1910

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2019 Ita Chairun Nissa, Puji Lestari, Dian Kumala

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This journal has been indexed in:

more

Creative Commons License
J-PS (Prisma Sains: Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu dan Pembelajaran Matematika dan IPA IKIP Mataram) p-ISSN (print) 2338-4530, e-ISSN (online) 2540-7899 is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats


[Valid Atom 1.0]